Act · the Standard in athlete language

What good support should look and feel like.

A policy on a website is not the test. The test is whether you can find help, trust the route, speak safely and see the organisation learn.

01

Can I find the support route without asking my coach?

02

Will someone explain what stays confidential and what cannot?

03

Can I raise a concern without risking selection or retaliation?

04

Does the organisation check whether its support works in practice?

P01 / 05

Athlete Support Systems

You should know where to go, what will happen next, and how to ask for help without your selection being put at risk.

In practice, you should be able to see

P1.1

Access to qualified professionals

Provision is qualified, available and proportionate to the organisation.

P1.2

Awareness and communication

Every athlete is proactively told what support exists.

P1.3

Check-ins and referral pathways

Wellbeing check-ins and routes to care are defined and used.

P1.4

Confidential access

Athletes can seek support without unnecessary coaching involvement.

P02 / 05

Staff Training & Awareness

A coach does not need to be your therapist, but they should know how to listen, what not to promise, and where to refer you.

In practice, you should be able to see

P2.1

Training coverage

Training reaches coaches, staff, volunteers and relevant departments.

P2.2

Recognition and response skills

Staff can recognise concern and respond without diagnosing.

P2.3

Designated mental-health lead

A named, trained person owns coordination and escalation.

P2.4

Training cadence and referral skills

Skills are refreshed and referral knowledge remains current.

P03 / 05

Policy, Governance & Accountability

Support should not depend on one kind person. It should survive staff changes, budget pressure and a difficult season.

In practice, you should be able to see

P3.1

Written wellbeing policy

A current, accessible policy defines commitments and boundaries.

P3.2

Leadership accountability

A governing or executive owner is answerable for delivery.

P3.3

Dedicated budget

Resources are allocated to make provision real.

P3.4

Athlete voice and policy review

Athletes shape provision and leadership closes the feedback loop.

P04 / 05

Crisis Response & Safeguarding

On the worst day, nobody should improvise. You should know how to raise a concern and the organisation should know how to act.

In practice, you should be able to see

P4.1

Crisis response protocol

A documented, rehearsed protocol covers foreseeable crises.

P4.2

Safeguarding officer and incident process

A trained officer owns a visible, non-retaliatory reporting process.

P4.3

External crisis partnerships

Relationships with qualified external services are established.

P4.4

Frontline and athlete readiness

Athletes know how to report; frontline staff know what to do.

P05 / 05

Culture & Environment

Speaking up should be normal, not brave. Your wellbeing should matter before performance breaks down, not only afterwards.

In practice, you should be able to see

P5.1

Anti-stigma and openness

The organisation actively makes help-seeking safe and ordinary.

P5.2

Transition support

Athletes are supported through deselection, injury and leaving sport.

P5.3

Workload and wellbeing balance

Training and organisational load decisions consider wellbeing.

P5.4

Climate assessment and reporting

Experience is measured and findings lead to visible improvement.

What the badge can—and cannot—tell you.

A current award means organisational systems were checked within a published scope. It does not promise that every athlete is well or that harm can never occur. Always check scope, exclusions, dates and status.

Check an organisation

Something does not match?

If there is immediate danger, use emergency or crisis support. For a safeguarding concern, use the dedicated safeguarding information. The formal public-complaints route remains an R2 release gate and will replace generic contact for certification concerns.